WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.200
This is the eat well, think well, live well podcast.
00:00:02.549 --> 00:00:09.089
I'm Lisa Salisbury, and this is episode 138 busting nutrition myths with Daron Vidai.
00:00:09.830 --> 00:00:13.949
Daron is a registered dietitian and runs eat right nutrition.
00:00:14.009 --> 00:00:22.149
I've noticed his work on social media, and I really admire his approach and the way he is able to explain where many social media posts.
00:00:22.329 --> 00:00:23.570
Go off the rails.
00:00:24.030 --> 00:00:27.809
And he really brings it back to the real science and research.
00:00:28.179 --> 00:00:33.850
We are going to be all over the place with different myths around nutrition that are often perpetuated on social media.
00:00:33.850 --> 00:00:40.100
So enjoy this one and let me know if there are any questionable trends out there that we need to address next time.
00:00:43.490 --> 00:00:44.270
Welcome to eat well.
00:00:44.899 --> 00:00:51.500
Well, the podcast for busy women who want to lose weight without constantly counting, tracking, or stressing over every bite.
00:00:51.829 --> 00:00:58.740
I'm Lisa Salsbury, a certified health weight loss and life coach, and most importantly, a recovered chronic dieter here.
00:00:58.770 --> 00:01:02.310
You'll learn to listen to your body and uncover the reasons you're reaching for food.
00:01:02.520 --> 00:01:07.799
When you're not truly hungry, freeing you to focus on a healthier, more fulfilling approach to eating.
00:01:11.611 --> 00:01:14.290
Welcome back to the eat well, think well, live well podcast.
00:01:14.320 --> 00:01:18.271
I am so excited to be interviewing, Vadai.
00:01:18.331 --> 00:01:26.001
He's a registered dietitian and I've been following him on Instagram for a little while and really impressed with his approach.
00:01:26.361 --> 00:01:28.960
And so I invited him on and thankfully he accepted.
00:01:28.960 --> 00:01:29.781
So welcome.
00:01:30.031 --> 00:01:35.085
Why don't you introduce yourself as As far as, um, you know, what you do and kind of how you help people.
00:01:35.115 --> 00:01:37.486
And then we'll get into our conversation.
00:01:38.271 --> 00:01:40.661
uh, yeah, so I'm a, you know, it's interesting.
00:01:40.661 --> 00:01:54.210
I recently just did a podcast where they were driving more towards like the performance side of things because my background is in bodybuilding and I guess they saw that and they constantly want to talk about performance and I'm like, that was a long time ago.
00:01:54.221 --> 00:01:57.590
So these days I focus a lot on.
00:01:58.450 --> 00:02:00.921
Weight loss, fat loss, and metabolic health.
00:02:00.921 --> 00:02:04.930
So metabolic health being non alcoholic fatty liver disease.
00:02:04.950 --> 00:02:08.161
Uh, we focus on cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk.
00:02:08.211 --> 00:02:10.491
We focus on type 2 diabetes.
00:02:10.881 --> 00:02:25.480
We also focus on intervening when they're taking medications, whether it be insulin, um, the GLP 1 medications, uh, and, uh, like something like metformin, and just managing overall lifestyle factors and risk factors for, uh, overall improving metabolic health.
00:02:27.066 --> 00:02:27.436
Okay.
00:02:27.496 --> 00:02:27.866
Awesome.
00:02:28.616 --> 00:02:29.026
Awesome.
00:02:29.075 --> 00:02:35.496
I, um, in a, in my past life, my first major in college was actually to be a registered dietitian.
00:02:35.515 --> 00:02:42.966
And I think it's so funny how many times I've kicked myself for not continuing with that and for changing my major, but these things happen.
00:02:43.545 --> 00:02:45.605
Um, so I admire what you do.
00:02:45.675 --> 00:02:48.006
Um, one of the things that you.
00:02:48.901 --> 00:03:01.121
Um, and one of on Instagram specifically and putting content out on is some of the myth busting out there and combating some of these people that are, you know, yelling in grocery stores and that sort of thing.
00:03:01.121 --> 00:03:09.080
So we're going to be discussing some of the top myths that are going around on Instagram, social media right now.
00:03:09.080 --> 00:03:09.961
I'm sure it's on TikTok.
00:03:10.001 --> 00:03:10.830
I'm just not on there.
00:03:11.290 --> 00:03:16.181
Um, but what I really want to talk about too is.
00:03:16.765 --> 00:03:21.855
The fact that at your education level, you know how to read studies properly.
00:03:22.105 --> 00:03:34.515
And I think this is one of the biggest things that, um, you and others like you consistently comment on when these wellness influencers come on and they go, this study showed, and then you say.
00:03:34.816 --> 00:03:37.943
Actually, that's not at all what it showed.
00:03:38.252 --> 00:03:52.663
So let's talk about studies first, and why it's so important to be able to read them properly, and what it is about your education that makes you qualified to read them, and like, what is the general population missing when they're looking at these studies?
00:03:52.682 --> 00:03:55.362
Why do they get interpreted so badly sometimes?
00:03:55.362 --> 00:03:57.323
So
00:03:57.538 --> 00:04:09.147
piece of that with people on social media is there's some bias in there and they're cherry picking specific studies that will prove their, uh, or, or support their thesis on whatever it may be.
00:04:09.157 --> 00:04:11.307
It could be, like, seed oils.
00:04:11.328 --> 00:04:17.747
It could be a keto diet is effective at, uh, treating cancer because, uh, glucose.
00:04:18.023 --> 00:04:27.733
can feed cancer cells and therefore cancer cells can't grow and then you starve them if, if, you know, if you don't have any, um, if you don't have any sugar in the diet, which isn't true, right?
00:04:28.112 --> 00:04:42.952
So, part of it is you may find some studies that are sort of outliers, but oftentimes when we find those outlier studies that don't agree with the general consensus, it's a study methodology flaw.
00:04:43.507 --> 00:04:43.807
Right?
00:04:43.807 --> 00:04:51.887
So one of the biggest things, the first thing I do when I look at when I'm trying to evaluate a study is I'll first go to the conclusion.
00:04:51.908 --> 00:04:53.208
Some people might say differently.
00:04:53.208 --> 00:04:55.048
Some people will be like, Oh, we go to the methods first.
00:04:55.307 --> 00:04:57.148
I'll go to the conclusion and I'll say, what did they find?
00:04:57.958 --> 00:05:04.827
And that will give me, okay, they found this, but this is kind of different from other research that I've read.
00:05:05.627 --> 00:05:09.148
And then I'll go into the methods and I'll say, how did they come to that conclusion?
00:05:10.208 --> 00:05:10.528
Right?
00:05:10.528 --> 00:05:12.257
So to give kind of an example of that.
00:05:12.968 --> 00:05:19.387
There was a recent, uh, there was a video that I did a while back on, you're familiar with, uh, Max Lugavere's, uh, podcast?
00:05:20.548 --> 00:05:29.338
Yeah, so there's, there was a, I don't know where they were from, there were two women that were talking about the artificial sweeteners.
00:05:29.617 --> 00:05:34.947
And artificial sweeteners increasing risk for Alzheimer's, and they mentioned a 2017 study.
00:05:34.947 --> 00:05:36.737
So I went in and I looked for that study.
00:05:37.637 --> 00:05:41.088
That study was published by the American Heart Association.
00:05:41.737 --> 00:05:45.557
And if you read into the study, it was patients with diabetes.
00:05:46.057 --> 00:05:50.478
That, this is where you kind of have to think about it from a practical standpoint.
00:05:50.937 --> 00:05:57.668
It was patients with type 2 diabetes that drank soda and they measured like how much soda they drank and then increased risk.
00:05:58.867 --> 00:06:06.237
And the issue with something like that is you can't really separate because they're just basically saying they're reporting how much they're drinking, right?
00:06:06.528 --> 00:06:09.507
We don't have a mechanism to say artificial sweeteners.
00:06:10.033 --> 00:06:11.492
Increased risk for Alzheimer's.
00:06:12.093 --> 00:06:18.072
But what we do have is a mechanism for type 2 diabetes increasing risk for Alzheimer's.
00:06:18.523 --> 00:06:20.882
So, it's a, it's like a, uh,
00:06:21.103 --> 00:06:23.463
because you, you didn't start with a healthy population.
00:06:23.952 --> 00:06:24.343
right.
00:06:24.362 --> 00:06:37.173
So, in my eyes, I look at that, and even the authors, when they conclude in there, the authors are typically pretty honest, and they'll say, Well, we can't, we can't decipher whether or not this is reverse causality.
00:06:37.182 --> 00:06:41.192
So, reverse causality would be, what came first, the chicken or the egg?
00:06:41.648 --> 00:06:41.918
Right?
00:06:41.918 --> 00:06:48.127
So were they already at higher risk and the diabetes exacerbated it and caused the Alzheimer's?
00:06:48.757 --> 00:06:50.177
Or was it the diet soda itself?
00:06:50.177 --> 00:07:01.648
And in my eyes, based on the current research and based, based on the fact that we don't have a mechanism that we've pointed to, right, a mechanism is where you start and then you look at the data and you say, okay, well, does the data support this mechanism?
00:07:01.648 --> 00:07:03.377
And sometimes it doesn't, sometimes it doesn't.
00:07:03.718 --> 00:07:05.548
In my eyes, it's reverse causality.
00:07:05.548 --> 00:07:10.437
So if you just think about it logically, if I go to the doctor and I'm a type two diabetic and my.
00:07:10.483 --> 00:07:12.973
Doctor says, Hey, you need to reduce your sugar intake.
00:07:13.423 --> 00:07:16.192
I'm going to switch from regular soda to diet soda.
00:07:16.762 --> 00:07:26.312
And then they're going to see that people who are diabetic are drinking more diet soda, and they happen to have an increased risk for Alzheimer's disease or increased development.
00:07:27.163 --> 00:07:28.173
It's not the diet soda.
00:07:28.173 --> 00:07:31.413
It's the fact that they're diabetic, which is a known risk factor for Alzheimer's.
00:07:31.413 --> 00:07:34.913
So it's really, you have to be careful about how you interpret these things.
00:07:35.432 --> 00:07:38.622
And I do think that a lot of people have to be honest about how they interpret these things.
00:07:38.622 --> 00:07:40.593
And I think on social media, that doesn't exist.
00:07:41.017 --> 00:07:44.677
Yeah, and there's such a difference between causality and correlation.
00:07:45.127 --> 00:07:49.057
I mean, I love those charts that are like, shark attacks go up with ice cream sales.
00:07:49.387 --> 00:08:06.338
You know, it's like, there, you can show correlation with so, so many things, and I mean, Alzheimer's has been called, like, type 3 diabetes, like, anecdotally, because it can be associated with metabolic disorders, so that's really interesting that they even bothered to look at diet soda when they already know that that is
00:08:08.973 --> 00:08:09.473
Yeah.
00:08:09.718 --> 00:08:10.218
I don't know.
00:08:10.353 --> 00:08:17.459
I mean, I think it's worthwhile, worthwhile studying, but I also think that diet sodas for the most part are pretty safe.
00:08:18.084 --> 00:08:18.365
Right.
00:08:18.394 --> 00:08:19.865
They've been around for a long time.
00:08:20.055 --> 00:08:32.465
Uh, there are people, I mean, I've even had professors in grad school that would disagree with that, but based on the data that I've seen, people talk about effects on microbiome and then you have to kind of decipher, okay, like which artificial sweetener are we talking about?
00:08:32.465 --> 00:08:41.434
Because some of them like aspartame, for example, it breaks down into, uh, phenylalanine and, aspartic acid, which are two amino acids and they get absorbed in your small intestine.
00:08:41.434 --> 00:08:51.120
So you can't kind of blanket statement and say, Oh, all artificial sweeteners, quote unquote disrupt the gut because aspartame doesn't even make it to the colon where the bacteria is anyway.
00:08:51.580 --> 00:08:53.750
So there are, you're not going to see any changes.
00:08:53.750 --> 00:08:56.669
And then we also have to define what is disruption?
00:08:56.679 --> 00:08:57.600
What does that even mean?
00:08:57.600 --> 00:09:00.490
Because everything that you eat is going to alter your microbiome.
00:09:00.500 --> 00:09:01.250
You eat more fiber.
00:09:01.250 --> 00:09:02.769
You eat a different type of carbohydrate.
00:09:03.049 --> 00:09:04.039
You eat more protein.
00:09:04.379 --> 00:09:08.960
Every single thing that you put into your body is going to Affect your microbiome in some way, shape or form.
00:09:09.539 --> 00:09:18.980
Ideally, what we want to do is we want to have more of the, be a greater proportion of the beneficial foods that are going to support a healthy gut microbiome.
00:09:18.980 --> 00:09:21.460
And in that case it's things like fiber.
00:09:21.909 --> 00:09:23.889
Really fiber is the, the most important one.
00:09:25.335 --> 00:09:32.684
Well, that's kind of, um, let's get into some of these myths and that's kind of one of the first ones that, um, artificial sweeteners are just so bad for you.
00:09:33.075 --> 00:09:35.345
Um, the cancer causing study, I think is.
00:09:35.730 --> 00:09:46.909
It's probably the most overdone because when clients ask me this, I'm like, well, do you drink diet Coke from the moment you wake up all the way through the day until you go to sleep?
00:09:46.919 --> 00:09:53.570
Like that's how much diet Coke you would have to have to match the amount of artificial sweetener they were giving in this study.
00:09:53.980 --> 00:09:59.720
I mean, that's a, obviously it's like a sort of general thing, but it was just so much.
00:09:59.730 --> 00:10:01.909
It's just not, it's not realistic.
00:10:01.909 --> 00:10:04.110
If you're having one a day, one every other day, like.
00:10:04.720 --> 00:10:06.149
It is not a problem, right?
00:10:07.019 --> 00:10:11.580
Yeah, I mean, I think, I think I heard my buddy Joey Munoz say this, that, do you drink enough water and it's gonna be bad for you.
00:10:11.639 --> 00:10:11.879
Right?
00:10:11.879 --> 00:10:15.164
So any, anything in excess is is not gonna be great.
00:10:17.480 --> 00:10:17.889
Okay.
00:10:17.940 --> 00:10:34.029
Well, um, one of the things I think that's really popular right now, just because in face of the, um, increasing popularity of the GLP one drugs is the term nature's ozempic wellness influencers love to tell you blueberries are nature's ozempic.
00:10:34.039 --> 00:10:39.460
And these things are, you know, Oat zempik, the oatmeal bowls, like, it's so silly.
00:10:39.789 --> 00:10:44.669
Um, but people fall for this because they're looking for that one thing that's gonna help them lose weight.
00:10:45.019 --> 00:10:49.509
And so they believe that if they just eat blueberries, they are a superfood.
00:10:49.559 --> 00:10:51.960
Why is that just not true?
00:10:52.948 --> 00:10:57.399
Uh, because of the half life of, uh, the GLP 1 produced.
00:10:57.428 --> 00:11:11.239
I think a lot of people think that when, and this was like the recent video that I did, a lot of people will get the misconception that these injections will raise your body's natural GLP 1 production, which isn't the case.
00:11:11.269 --> 00:11:13.599
The half life of that is about like two to five minutes.
00:11:14.163 --> 00:11:19.303
Maybe a little bit more, maybe a little bit less, depending on which study you look at, but it's a very short lived.
00:11:19.583 --> 00:11:20.903
It does help, right?
00:11:20.933 --> 00:11:27.409
And there are other hormones that are involved in controlling appetite when you eat whole foods, right?
00:11:27.429 --> 00:11:29.700
Whole, unprocessed, predominantly unprocessed foods.
00:11:30.129 --> 00:11:35.139
There are other effects or other hormones that we can point to and say, hey, this is why it's gonna leave you satiated.
00:11:35.169 --> 00:11:44.840
But when we look at GLP 1 in particular, that hormone's half life is very short versus you get a full seven day half life on an injectable.
00:11:45.715 --> 00:12:01.934
Right, now, I would advise most people to still, obviously, eat a healthy diet, don't eat junk food, because I, I even have clients that take GLP 1s and they still, they still overeat because they're eating calorically dense foods, right?
00:12:01.934 --> 00:12:04.794
So, it has more to do with, like, the volume of food that you're eating.
00:12:04.794 --> 00:12:11.679
If you're eating a small volume of food, and it's very calorically dense, you're still not going to lose weight taking these drugs.
00:12:11.710 --> 00:12:13.330
That's my experience with it.
00:12:13.809 --> 00:12:16.509
Some people will lose a massive amount of weight very quickly.
00:12:16.509 --> 00:12:20.799
Some people will not respond as well, and they still need to make those lifestyle changes.
00:12:22.700 --> 00:12:31.669
But the idea that a food will work as well as an injectable medication, or just really any pharmaceutical medication, it's just not true.
00:12:32.000 --> 00:12:34.360
And it doesn't mean we don't want to eat blueberries, absolutely.
00:12:34.595 --> 00:12:34.945
Eat them.
00:12:35.745 --> 00:12:36.215
Eat them.
00:12:36.554 --> 00:12:42.674
But not because they are some magical GLP 1 mimic.
00:12:43.799 --> 00:12:44.129
Yeah.
00:12:44.179 --> 00:12:47.019
I mean, you're not going to get the same, you're not even going to get close to the same effect.
00:12:47.019 --> 00:12:49.440
You're going to get two to five minutes versus seven day half life.
00:12:49.440 --> 00:12:50.659
It's completely different.
00:12:52.325 --> 00:13:06.865
Okay, um, another thing that we see a lot on, um, on social media is the whole band in Europe, but not in the US or, um, they have so much more stricter guidelines or, you know, all of that kind of thing.
00:13:06.865 --> 00:13:13.725
I, I think one of the most popular things is Europe allows 400 ingredients and we allow 10, 000.
00:13:13.725 --> 00:13:18.235
And they weren't comparing in that particular one, they weren't comparing apples to oranges.
00:13:18.264 --> 00:13:20.585
It was, um, are you familiar with that?
00:13:20.879 --> 00:13:21.600
Oh, sorry.
00:13:21.649 --> 00:13:22.419
Which, which one?
00:13:23.147 --> 00:13:44.667
you know, um, I, I don't want to like throw people under the bus, but, There's a pretty famous clip of, I believe she goes by FoodBabe, and she talks about how there's 10, 000 ingredients allowed in the US food production and only 400 in Europe, but it is absolutely apples to oranges because she's cherry picking which ingredients they're counting.
00:13:45.076 --> 00:13:46.657
Do you know that stat that I'm talking about?
00:13:47.671 --> 00:13:49.620
I don't know the exact specific stat.
00:13:49.671 --> 00:13:54.671
I can speak to the artificial colorings that they use.
00:13:55.380 --> 00:13:58.750
And the Europe actually uses more than us in terms of artificial colorings.
00:13:59.105 --> 00:14:04.426
And I think a lot of people like red 40 is a big one where people are like red 40 is banned in the UK.
00:14:04.426 --> 00:14:05.485
You don't see it on their labels.
00:14:05.485 --> 00:14:07.586
And it's, well, that's because it's called the E 1 29.
00:14:07.586 --> 00:14:09.785
It's not, it's not called red 40.
00:14:09.816 --> 00:14:12.495
They just call it something different and they allow it into the, in the food.
00:14:13.155 --> 00:14:15.605
Uh, but I think also when we look at some of that.
00:14:16.186 --> 00:14:17.956
We have to look at how the U.
00:14:17.956 --> 00:14:18.186
S.
00:14:18.196 --> 00:14:20.625
versus Europe approaches certain things.
00:14:21.166 --> 00:14:21.975
And in the U.
00:14:21.975 --> 00:14:31.279
S., we follow a, hazard plus dosage format, where we're saying, Okay, well, what is the, uh, what is the dosage that we're getting in?
00:14:31.299 --> 00:14:33.590
And in Europe, they follow just overall hazard.
00:14:34.240 --> 00:14:34.559
Right?
00:14:34.559 --> 00:14:50.544
So, I don't, I can't speak to who's right or wrong in regards to that, but based on the data, for example, if we look at the recent one that was just banned by the FDA, which is red number three, I'm not convinced everybody's talking about like fruit loops and they have red number three.
00:14:50.575 --> 00:14:53.664
And in my eyes, I, I, you have to think macro, right?
00:14:53.664 --> 00:14:57.735
People are so fixated on these individual ingredients.
00:14:57.784 --> 00:14:59.475
And at the end of the day, that's fine.
00:14:59.485 --> 00:15:00.294
I'm totally fine.
00:15:00.294 --> 00:15:13.495
If you want to take red, red number three out and you want to replace it, like the better alternative is always going to be just to be on the safe side to, we can use fruit and vegetable coloring.
00:15:14.445 --> 00:15:15.164
It's totally fine.
00:15:15.184 --> 00:15:16.075
I'm okay with that.
00:15:16.455 --> 00:15:18.485
But let's not demonize something.
00:15:18.909 --> 00:15:22.429
That isn't, there is no evidence to show that it's bad.
00:15:22.460 --> 00:15:25.059
In my eyes, the red number three, there's no evidence to show that it's bad.
00:15:25.320 --> 00:15:28.120
And there's not enough evidence to support safety of it.
00:15:28.129 --> 00:15:34.679
So I do think we should study it further, but also Fruit Loops are still going to be Fruit Loops at the end of the day.
00:15:34.700 --> 00:15:36.840
That's not the biggest thing that's going to affect you.
00:15:36.840 --> 00:15:40.529
The biggest thing that's going to affect you is that you're eating Fruit Loops in the morning every day.
00:15:41.423 --> 00:15:51.352
Yeah, it's, it's so far down on the list of what we need to attack in order to have a healthier diet, which leads into the idea of, um, ultra processed foods.
00:15:51.732 --> 00:15:57.432
I think it's, so you did a video on this about demonizing the ultra processed foods ingredients.
00:15:57.942 --> 00:16:02.663
And so obviously there's a lot of ingredients and ultra processed foods.
00:16:03.018 --> 00:16:06.187
I do not choose, for myself, to eat.
00:16:06.918 --> 00:16:12.357
Most of the reason, truly, is because I haven't eaten that for so long, it doesn't taste good to me anymore.
00:16:12.778 --> 00:16:22.067
Like, I, I feel like I can taste the sort of chemical nature of some of those artificial, flavorings and colorings, and so I don't enjoy a lot of those foods.
00:16:22.638 --> 00:16:33.043
But, The ingredients themselves is not as critical as the fact that you can consume so many calories in one sitting.
00:16:33.643 --> 00:16:37.883
And I think that really is one of these, also these myths that gets kind of lost.
00:16:37.893 --> 00:16:39.163
Can you speak to that a little bit?
00:16:40.513 --> 00:16:40.812
Yeah.
00:16:40.812 --> 00:16:47.967
So at the end of the day, When we look at like the plethora of data, calories are what is going to matter the most from a health standpoint.
00:16:47.967 --> 00:16:50.085
So, you're right about that.
00:16:50.804 --> 00:17:13.519
Now, it's kind of a, it's I'm kind of conflicted on this, to be honest, because here's the thing, individual ingredients, if we look at, uh, like a soybean oil or, uh, uh, safflower oil, like something that's high in omega 6, uh, and we look at high fructose corn syrup, those in and of themselves, like we have data that shows that.
00:17:13.630 --> 00:17:23.022
When you consume those things not in a caloric surplus, either in a maintenance calories or a calorie deficit, there aren't really any adverse health effects.
00:17:23.032 --> 00:17:28.732
So the adverse effects come from the sheer quantity of calories that you're consuming.
00:17:29.313 --> 00:17:43.948
Now, I can make an argument that Those are the ingredients in specific foods that make it hyper palatable, that make it stimulate your brain's pleasure and reward center, that make you want more, right?
00:17:43.948 --> 00:17:51.268
Companies are in business to sell more of their products, and they do a very good job at making you want more of those products.
00:17:51.657 --> 00:17:52.147
So.
00:17:52.488 --> 00:18:05.018
I could make an argument that consuming more of those things will lead you to eat more calories, but those ingredients in and of themselves aren't necessarily harmful.
00:18:05.347 --> 00:18:08.218
So, my stance is kind of this.
00:18:08.762 --> 00:18:19.022
Yeah, you want to avoid those ingredients, but not because the ingredients are bad for you, because the foods that contain those ingredients are highly processed, hyperpalatable.
00:18:19.242 --> 00:18:21.722
They're not very satiating because they're ultra processed.
00:18:21.722 --> 00:18:24.313
They're basically kind of pre digested for you.
00:18:24.762 --> 00:18:29.853
So, yes, avoid those ingredients, but not for the reasons that people say, if that makes sense.
00:18:30.042 --> 00:18:31.093
Yeah, totally.
00:18:31.093 --> 00:18:41.482
I think that's such an important nuance because it's not that seed oils in particular are the devil, it's what they're incorporated into.
00:18:42.002 --> 00:18:45.982
And so you have to look at the food as a whole.
00:18:46.343 --> 00:18:54.752
And certainly when you're choosing cooking oils for yourself, when you're cooking from scratch at home, you can decide what kind of oil you want to use.
00:18:54.782 --> 00:19:05.107
And if you decide to use It's not going to be the same as that ultra and so you're going to saute your chicken and vegetables in soft flour oil.
00:19:05.248 --> 00:19:15.525
That's a completely different end product than the ultra processed food, the, the crackers and the cookies and the, um, you know, other bars and whatever that contain those ingredients.
00:19:15.535 --> 00:19:17.744
It's going to be a totally different end product.
00:19:18.305 --> 00:19:20.785
Yeah, I mean, I would say this from like a smoking standpoint.
00:19:20.805 --> 00:19:25.825
I personally like to cook with avocado oil just because it can withstand a higher heat.
00:19:25.825 --> 00:19:33.555
I think it's like 425 or 450 degrees Fahrenheit, so it's less likely to oxidize, right?
00:19:33.585 --> 00:19:34.585
And this is where we get.
00:19:34.585 --> 00:19:43.404
We see studies on frying foods in, like a soybean oil or something like a McDonald's would use that right that when it's heat.
00:19:43.464 --> 00:19:44.555
point on seed oils.
00:19:44.575 --> 00:19:45.694
Are they, I haven't
00:19:45.734 --> 00:19:53.275
It's, it's, I don't know exactly the smoke point, but it's much lower, so it's a lot more likely to oxidize and then you create trans fats.
00:19:53.285 --> 00:20:01.545
So yeah, when you're going to a fast food restaurant and they're frying with the fries, they're frying it and they're reusing the oil over and over again, that can definitely be problematic.
00:20:02.055 --> 00:20:02.484
But.
00:20:03.045 --> 00:20:12.428
When we see studies on actual like seed oils, it's interesting the seed oil thing came from I don't know if you want me to get dive deep into it.
00:20:12.498 --> 00:20:14.627
The seed oil thing comes from a mechanism, right?
00:20:14.627 --> 00:20:29.248
So you have two different pathways you have a pathway in in a metabolic pathway in which omega 6 goes down is called the arachidonic acid pathway and then you have where the Omega 3 goes down a separate pathway.
00:20:29.298 --> 00:20:30.438
They kind of split off.
00:20:31.178 --> 00:20:33.557
And so the omega 6,
00:20:34.057 --> 00:20:34.938
sorry, let me interrupt.
00:20:35.008 --> 00:20:41.141
By pathway, do you mean a digestive pathway, or like, what, what is this pathway starting and ending
00:20:41.178 --> 00:20:44.718
it's, it's a metabolic pathway, I believe, within your cells, right?